- Description: In regards to the wake turbulence, as stated earlier (in comments
above for time stamp at 1539), no weather data has been released by
the NTSB to justify the postulation that 587 encountered wake
turbulence at 1539. To believe 587 encountered wake turbulence now,
at 1559 (the start of the rudder movements) is akin to black magic
and witchcraft. And this is no exaggeration or sensationalistic
claim. Heres why 1. Pilots from many transport categories have
mentioned to me that the way the NTSB has proffered the wake
turbulence scenario is inconsistent with real world turbulence and
inconsistent with the events that unfolded in the cockpit during
those 20 seconds. For example Why was there a 2nd rattle at 1554
five seconds before the alleged second wake encounter at 1559? Why
did the pilot call for the escape procedure 13 seconds after the
first wake encounter and 7 seconds before the next? 2. If the winds
at at 91559 am (the time of the alleged 2nd wake encounter) at
2400 feet (587s altitude according to the NTSB) were from the same
general heading as they were at 7 am (approximately 330 degrees) it
would mean that the wake vortices distance to 587 would be over 1
nautical mile away. This would require a consistent 40 knot wind
from 330 degrees! We havent seen any supporting data. We dont see
the Emperors new clothes. 3. If the weather data suggests wind
coming from the west (270 degrees) then this wake encounter is still
impossible given the fact that JAL47 was at 3800 feet at that point,
1400 feet above where the NTSB says 587 was (at 2400 feet). That
would require the wake vortices to fall at a rate of 933 feet per
minute AND travel laterally at 28 knots. Dr. Fred Proctor, a wake
turbulence expert with NASAs Langley Research Center, states that
wake vortices fall at 300 to 480 feet per minute before they begin
to decay. If we are generous to the wake encounter theory, and grant
that the vortices did not decay at all during the 90 seconds and
fell at a maximum rate o...
-
-
-
-